Thursday, February 3, 2011

#103 2nd stock mkt crash acid test of keiserism

#103 2nd stock mkt crash acid test of keiserism

Missouri has always been known as the "show me" state.

Sometimes I think most u.s. citizens are from there.

If there is one thing Max Keiser and others in his camp have said loudly and clearly,
it's that this economic position the u.s. banksters are causing is going to lead to a double dip depression (or recession depending on your preference for what to call it).

I don't want it to happen at all, but if it's going to happen, which I also personally think it is, I wish it would happen soon, hopefully expedited by us u.s. and non-u.s. non-banksters buying silver. I'm tired of being lectured to by most of the people I know who are still brain-deadened by the mainstream media.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

#102 revolving super powers or the end of humanity?

#102 revolving super powers or the end of humanity?

China was once a super power many dynasties ago.

Egypt was once a super power thousands of years ago.

Rome was a super power 2000 years ago.

Is history repeating itself?

China's clearly back, Gerald Celente says Italy may have something with non-hot fusion and Egypt controls the Suez Canal.

Britain and the u.s. have had their chance hundreds of years ago, just like the scientist in "Jurassic Park" said the dinosaurs had their chance hundreds of millions of years ago.

So the question for humanity is whether thousands of years or millions of years of the Earth's story is repeating itself?

I hope for the former (yay people!) but I fear the latter (yay some other life form or forms!).

#101 crash 2.0 enough to wake up u.s. citizens? CRASH JP MORGAN BUY silVer

#101 crash 2.0 enough to wake up u.s. citizens? CRASH JP MORGAN BUY silVer

Most u.s. citizens are still asleep, maybe the next crash due any day now and 40%+ real (18%+ fake) unemployment is needed.

Or maybe crash QE3 and crash 3.0 is needed to reach the tipping point of 60%+ (27%+ fake) unemployed.

Or maybe just some old fashioned hyper-inflation will do the trick with just a little bit more abuse by the banksters of the people and Mother Nature.

It's not nice to abuse the people and Mother Nature, especially at the same time.

Central banks in the past didn't have to worry about ecological issues and eventually failed anyway.

Now that they are also faced with a failing environment, they should actually fail more easily.

And maybe they are since for the first time in 3 years Egypt has them afraid.

Fear knows no boundaries, even touches sociopaths.

#100 gold only valuable when too much of a currency

#100 gold only valuable when too much of a currency

Let's be realistic - it's the 21st century.

Anything but digital transactions is too time consuming.

We may use gold and silver for a while but I'm reminded of a tv commercial where a young man picks up an item in a store and pockets it. A voice sounding like it's coming from a sound system says "Thank you Mr. Whatever for your purchase."

Now that's an efficient use of time and I think we're headed that way.

But that doesn't take us off the gold standard, nothing can.

One way or another, the value of a currency will come through when the market reports its price per ounce of gold.

If there's too much currency doing nothing then it will find its way to gold.

If there's too little currency doing nothing then less will find its way to gold.

Manipulate it by flooding the market with it, it doesn't matter, currency doing nothing will go after it.

And there's only currency with lots of it doing nothing, especially not being used to boost productivity like the also overly plentiful Chinese yuan, and that's the U.S. dollar.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

#99 gold std only true law of economics

#99 gold std only true law of economics

You can run and hide but you can’t escape the gold standard.

You can manipulate and censor but it always emerges, exposing the weaknesses in and proclaiming the strengths of all currencies.

It is the only true law of economics.

The more each country has the better it looks for each country but being honest about how much currency it has is most important for each country - I'd rather deal with a country with one ounce of gold that says it must devalue its currency to optimize economic performance and then devalues its currency to a trillion pieces of paper per ounce of gold, then a country with all the rest of the gold that says it doesn't have to devalue at all and then does so anyway from 1 piece of paper per ounce of gold to 1 plus 1 trillioneth pieces of paper per ounce of gold.

#98 wall st afraid after egypt CRASH JP MORGAN BUY silVer

#98 wall st afraid after egypt CRASH JP MORGAN BUY silVer

Well, a normal person would know that if you never service a car that sooner or later it's going to break down, one way or another.

Yet it comes as a surprise to Wall Street that things aren't going exactly as planned.

A car has thousands of parts.

Earth has billions of people, hundreds of countries and cultures.

The only surprise for normal people is when we're not surprised, which isn't very often.

Einsteins said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

I'm beginning to think the definition of sociopathy is doing different things each time and expecting the same result.

Each country is different. Expecting each to act the same way is, for lack of a better word, crazy.

First there was Iceland to say "no", then Tunisia, now Egypt. Who's going to be next?

Yes, definitely let's have a QE3, speed up the process, get it over with, and think of the bankerment only as a bad memory.

"the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one"

"the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one"

- Mr. Spock from the movie Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.

We need to agree on some definitions before we can discuss what's going on in the world, much less what to do about it.

What we have now is "the desires of the few or the one outweigh the needs of the many."

Can we even agree that "the needs of the many outweigh the desires of the few or the one?"

If so, can even fair (sociopath-less) competition ever result in the "the needs of the many outweighing the desires of the one or the few?"

I hope so, but don't know, because we've always had to deal with the sociopaths.

So we don't really know if we need to compete and/or cooperate synergistically.

To paraphrase Shakespeare, to compete and/or not compete, "that is the question?"